CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold ProbKnot
MCC 0.599 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.123 > 0.574 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.629 > 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.575 > 0.525
Total TP 302 > 294
Total TN 73627 > 73592
Total FP 280 < 341
Total FP CONTRA 101 < 114
Total FP INCONS 122 < 152
Total FP COMP 57 < 75
Total FN 178 < 186
P-value 3.13260312532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 302
Total TN 73627
Total FP 280
Total FP CONTRA 101
Total FP INCONS 122
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 178
Total Scores
MCC 0.599
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.629
Positive Predictive Value 0.575
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.39 0.20 20 22341 95 44 35 16 31
3IZ4_A 0.57 0.58 0.57 55 25440 49 18 23 8 40
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3NKB_B - 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 713 9 0 9 0 6
3NPB_A 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2243 9 1 3 5 6
3O58_3 0.32 0.36 0.29 8 4736 21 7 13 1 14
3PDR_A 0.83 0.86 0.80 43 4786 13 5 6 2 7
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 294
Total TN 73592
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 114
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 186
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.82 0.87 0.77 20 1998 15 6 0 9 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.