CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.573 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.224 > 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.554 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.605 > 0.475
Total TP 72 > 57
Total TN 9017 > 9016
Total FP 64 < 73
Total FP CONTRA 18 < 23
Total FP INCONS 29 < 40
Total FP COMP 17 > 10
Total FN 58 < 73
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 72
Total TN 9017
Total FP 64
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 58
Total Scores
MCC 0.573
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 9016
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.