CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold MCFold
MCC 0.688 > 0.587
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.197 > 0.549 ± 0.182
Sensitivity 0.680 > 0.618
Positive Predictive Value 0.705 > 0.570
Total TP 153 > 139
Total TN 15704 > 15677
Total FP 77 < 129
Total FP CONTRA 20 < 24
Total FP INCONS 44 < 81
Total FP COMP 13 < 24
Total FN 72 < 86
P-value 4.94879201882e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 153
Total TN 15704
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 72
Total Scores
MCC 0.688
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.197
Sensitivity 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.705
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 139
Total TN 15677
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 81
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.587
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.549 ± 0.182
Sensitivity 0.618
Positive Predictive Value 0.570
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3NKB_B - 0.68 0.74 0.64 14 713 8 2 6 0 5
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.