CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.723 > 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.740 ± 0.196 > 0.589 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.703 > 0.629
Positive Predictive Value 0.751 > 0.734
Total TP 142 > 127
Total TN 14747 < 14763
Total FP 60 < 67
Total FP CONTRA 17 > 16
Total FP INCONS 30 = 30
Total FP COMP 13 < 21
Total FN 60 < 75
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 14747
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.723
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.740 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 14763
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 75
Total Scores
MCC 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.589 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.629
Positive Predictive Value 0.734
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3O58_3 0.54 0.50 0.58 11 4745 20 5 3 12 11
3PDR_A 0.87 0.88 0.86 44 4789 10 4 3 3 6
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.