CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & Mastr(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold Mastr(20)
MCC 0.731 > 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.230 > 0.429 ± 0.304
Sensitivity 0.712 > 0.304
Positive Predictive Value 0.757 < 0.778
Total TP 131 > 56
Total TN 14235 < 14336
Total FP 55 > 17
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 5
Total FP INCONS 26 > 11
Total FP COMP 13 > 1
Total FN 53 < 128
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and Mastr(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and Mastr(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and Mastr(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 14235
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Mastr(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 56
Total TN 14336
Total FP 17
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 128
Total Scores
MCC 0.483
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.429 ± 0.304
Sensitivity 0.304
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4AOB_A 0.42 0.34 0.53 10 1418 10 1 8 1 19
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.