Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Cylofold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
Cylofold |
|
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|---|
| MCC |
0.701 |
>
|
0.666 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.755
±
0.445
|
>
|
0.622
±
0.286
|
| Sensitivity |
0.675 |
>
|
0.584 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.743 |
<
|
0.776 |
| Total TP |
52 |
>
|
45 |
| Total TN |
2863 |
<
|
2875 |
| Total FP |
19 |
=
|
19 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
>
|
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
13 |
>
|
11 |
| Total FP COMP |
1 |
<
|
6 |
| Total FN |
25 |
<
|
32 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for Cylofold
and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and PETfold_pre2.0(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for Cylofold
and PETfold_pre2.0(seed)).
Performance of Cylofold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
52 |
| Total TN |
2863 |
| Total FP |
19 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
| Total FP INCONS |
13 |
| Total FP COMP |
1 |
| Total FN |
25 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.701 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.755
±
0.445
|
| Sensitivity |
0.675 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.743 |
| Nr of predictions |
4 |
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
45 |
| Total TN |
2875 |
| Total FP |
19 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
11 |
| Total FP COMP |
6 |
| Total FN |
32 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.666 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.622
±
0.286
|
| Sensitivity |
0.584 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.776 |
| Nr of predictions |
4 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
