CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold ProbKnot
MCC 0.676 > 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.169 > 0.615 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.664 < 0.675
Positive Predictive Value 0.697 > 0.634
Total TP 184 < 187
Total TN 19118 > 19087
Total FP 102 < 137
Total FP CONTRA 27 < 43
Total FP INCONS 53 < 65
Total FP COMP 22 < 29
Total FN 93 > 90
P-value 1.00909278955e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 184
Total TN 19118
Total FP 102
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 93
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.658 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.664
Positive Predictive Value 0.697
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 187
Total TN 19087
Total FP 137
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 29
Total FN 90
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.615 ± 0.161
Sensitivity 0.675
Positive Predictive Value 0.634
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.82 0.87 0.77 20 1998 15 6 0 9 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.