CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RDfolder
MCC 0.699 > 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.218 > 0.389 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.668 > 0.378
Positive Predictive Value 0.746 > 0.525
Total TP 129 > 73
Total TN 8124 < 8158
Total FP 46 < 67
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 13
Total FP INCONS 34 < 53
Total FP COMP 2 > 1
Total FN 64 < 120
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 8124
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 64
Total Scores
MCC 0.699
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.668
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 73
Total TN 8158
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 53
Total FP COMP 1
Total FN 120
Total Scores
MCC 0.435
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.389 ± 0.217
Sensitivity 0.378
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.