CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RNAwolf
MCC 0.664 > 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.246 > 0.459 ± 0.190
Sensitivity 0.650 > 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.693 > 0.520
Total TP 106 > 77
Total TN 6866 < 6871
Total FP 49 < 76
Total FP CONTRA 13 > 10
Total FP INCONS 34 < 61
Total FP COMP 2 < 5
Total FN 57 < 86
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 6866
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.246
Sensitivity 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 77
Total TN 6871
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 86
Total Scores
MCC 0.484
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.459 ± 0.190
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.520
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.