CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & Carnac(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold Carnac(20)
MCC 0.621 > 0.589
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.179 > 0.497 ± 0.214
Sensitivity 0.637 > 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.611 < 0.908
Total TP 214 > 129
Total TN 46388 < 46596
Total FP 182 > 21
Total FP CONTRA 45 > 6
Total FP INCONS 91 > 7
Total FP COMP 46 > 8
Total FN 122 < 207
P-value 9.84540901819e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and Carnac(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Carnac(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and Carnac(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and Carnac(20)).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 46388
Total FP 182
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of Carnac(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Carnac(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 129
Total TN 46596
Total FP 21
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 8
Total FN 207
Total Scores
MCC 0.589
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.497 ± 0.214
Sensitivity 0.384
Positive Predictive Value 0.908
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Carnac(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.31 0.88 29 25503 4 3 1 0 66
3NPB_A 0.46 0.22 1.00 8 2270 3 0 0 3 29
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.75 0.58 0.97 29 4810 3 1 0 2 21
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.72 0.55 0.94 16 1516 1 0 1 0 13
4A1C_2 0.42 0.25 0.71 5 4509 3 0 2 1 15
4AOB_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 14 1418 6 2 3 1 15
4ENB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 472 0 0 0 0 15
4ENC_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 496 0 0 0 0 15

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.