CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Fold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Fold RNAwolf
MCC 0.468 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.228 > 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.475 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.478 > 0.452
Total TP 87 > 80
Total TN 11353 < 11358
Total FP 113 < 114
Total FP CONTRA 28 > 22
Total FP INCONS 67 < 75
Total FP COMP 18 > 17
Total FN 96 < 103
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Fold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Fold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Fold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of Fold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 87
Total TN 11353
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.478
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.15 0.18 0.17 2 399 11 4 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 11358
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.