CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots Cylofold
MCC 0.715 > 0.693
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.130 > 0.672 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.739 > 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.700 < 0.715
Total TP 229 > 211
Total TN 20874 < 20906
Total FP 112 > 106
Total FP CONTRA 37 > 27
Total FP INCONS 61 > 57
Total FP COMP 14 < 22
Total FN 81 < 99
P-value 1.4651262096e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 229
Total TN 20874
Total FP 112
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 81
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.727 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.739
Positive Predictive Value 0.700
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 5 0 4 1 5
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3O58_3 0.26 0.36 0.19 8 4722 35 16 18 1 14
3PDR_A 0.81 0.80 0.82 40 4791 11 3 6 2 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 211
Total TN 20906
Total FP 106
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 57
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 99
Total Scores
MCC 0.693
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.672 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.715
Nr of predictions 13

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.85 0.87 0.83 20 2000 12 4 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.