CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots IPknot
MCC 0.651 > 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.201 > 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.678 > 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.636 < 0.658
Total TP 124 > 106
Total TN 11340 < 11374
Total FP 87 > 66
Total FP CONTRA 29 > 17
Total FP INCONS 42 > 38
Total FP COMP 16 > 11
Total FN 59 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and IPknot).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 11340
Total FP 87
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 42
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.679 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.678
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 12 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 11374
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.