CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for HotKnots & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric HotKnots TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.689 > 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.739 ± 0.322 > 0.668 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.712 > 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.676 < 0.714
Total TP 94 > 80
Total TN 9181 < 9208
Total FP 60 > 42
Total FP CONTRA 21 > 11
Total FP INCONS 24 > 21
Total FP COMP 15 > 10
Total FN 38 < 52
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of HotKnots and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for HotKnots and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for HotKnots and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of HotKnots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for HotKnots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 94
Total TN 9181
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 24
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 38
Total Scores
MCC 0.689
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.739 ± 0.322
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.676
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for HotKnots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 12 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9208
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.