CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Cylofold
MCC 0.666 > 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.224 < 0.663 ± 0.246
Sensitivity 0.620 < 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.732 > 0.693
Total TP 101 < 106
Total TN 6881 > 6866
Total FP 40 < 49
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 13
Total FP INCONS 28 < 34
Total FP COMP 3 > 2
Total FN 62 > 57
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 6881
Total FP 40
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 62
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.620
Positive Predictive Value 0.732
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 6866
Total FP 49
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.664
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.663 ± 0.246
Sensitivity 0.650
Positive Predictive Value 0.693
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.17 0.18 0.20 2 401 9 3 5 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.