CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Fold
MCC 0.612 > 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.219 > 0.424 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.579 > 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.658 > 0.478
Total TP 106 > 87
Total TN 11374 > 11353
Total FP 66 < 113
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 28
Total FP INCONS 38 < 67
Total FP COMP 11 < 18
Total FN 77 < 96
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of IPknot and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for IPknot and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for IPknot and Fold).

^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 11374
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 87
Total TN 11353
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 28
Total FP INCONS 67
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.424 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.475
Positive Predictive Value 0.478
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.15 0.18 0.17 2 399 11 4 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.