CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold Fold
MCC 0.544 > 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.179 > 0.449 ± 0.204
Sensitivity 0.588 > 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.514 < 0.521
Total TP 144 > 135
Total TN 20157 < 20178
Total FP 174 > 159
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 38
Total FP INCONS 100 > 86
Total FP COMP 38 > 35
Total FN 101 < 110
P-value 0.0318548130709

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and Fold).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 144
Total TN 20157
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3NKB_B - 0.68 0.74 0.64 14 713 8 2 6 0 5
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 135
Total TN 20178
Total FP 159
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 86
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 110
Total Scores
MCC 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.449 ± 0.204
Sensitivity 0.551
Positive Predictive Value 0.521
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.15 0.18 0.17 2 399 11 4 6 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 4 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.