CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(20) Afold
MCC 0.667 > 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.176 > 0.593 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.617 > 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.725 > 0.547
Total TP 187 > 179
Total TN 42250 > 42181
Total FP 110 < 190
Total FP CONTRA 37 < 51
Total FP INCONS 34 < 97
Total FP COMP 39 < 42
Total FN 116 < 124
P-value 6.35199149577e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 187
Total TN 42250
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 37
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 39
Total FN 116
Total Scores
MCC 0.667
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.176
Sensitivity 0.617
Positive Predictive Value 0.725
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.74 0.73 0.76 16 1087 6 1 4 1 6
3IVN_B 0.81 0.74 0.89 17 884 2 2 0 0 6
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.54 0.63 51 25455 35 18 12 5 44
3JYV_7 0.95 0.90 1.00 18 1093 2 0 0 2 2
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 9 2 4 3 10
3O58_3 0.62 0.59 0.65 13 4744 18 5 2 11 9
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 36 8 11 17 15
4ENB_A 0.29 0.13 0.67 2 469 1 0 1 0 13

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 42181
Total FP 190
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 97
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.