CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.593 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.268 < 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.533 = 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.672 > 0.602
Total TP 80 = 80
Total TN 9729 > 9715
Total FP 57 < 66
Total FP CONTRA 11 < 17
Total FP INCONS 28 < 36
Total FP COMP 18 > 13
Total FN 70 = 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9729
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.268
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9715
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.602
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.