CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Mastr(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Mastr(20) MCFold
MCC 0.620 > 0.506
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.235 > 0.492 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.451 < 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.863 > 0.482
Total TP 132 < 160
Total TN 22859 > 22680
Total FP 24 < 208
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 51
Total FP INCONS 13 < 121
Total FP COMP 3 < 36
Total FN 161 > 133
P-value 1.86109605532e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Mastr(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Mastr(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Mastr(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Mastr(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Mastr(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 132
Total TN 22859
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 13
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 161
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.548 ± 0.235
Sensitivity 0.451
Positive Predictive Value 0.863
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Mastr(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1088 3 0 3 0 5
3GX2_A 0.46 0.39 0.55 11 1429 10 2 7 1 17
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3O58_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4764 0 0 0 0 22
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4840 0 0 0 0 50
3RKF_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 17 849 0 0 0 0 7
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4516 0 0 0 0 20
4ENB_A 0.44 0.20 1.00 3 469 0 0 0 0 12
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 160
Total TN 22680
Total FP 208
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 121
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 133
Total Scores
MCC 0.506
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.492 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.482
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3GX2_A 0.58 0.61 0.57 17 1419 15 1 12 2 11
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3JYV_7 0.25 0.30 0.24 6 1086 20 8 11 1 14
3LA5_A 0.44 0.44 0.48 11 931 12 2 10 0 14
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.