CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & McQFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect McQFold
MCC 0.648 > 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.113 > 0.625 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.660 > 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.637 > 0.475
Total TP 953 > 708
Total TN 1567351 < 1567358
Total FP 673 < 884
Total FP CONTRA 180 < 198
Total FP INCONS 364 < 584
Total FP COMP 129 > 102
Total FN 492 < 737
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and McQFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and McQFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and McQFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and McQFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and McQFold).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 953
Total TN 1567351
Total FP 673
Total FP CONTRA 180
Total FP INCONS 364
Total FP COMP 129
Total FN 492
Total Scores
MCC 0.648
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.630 ± 0.113
Sensitivity 0.660
Positive Predictive Value 0.637
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.80 0.79 0.81 22 1445 6 1 4 1 6
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.17 17 22342 96 41 40 15 34
3IZ4_A 0.61 0.61 0.62 58 25442 42 14 22 6 37
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3JYV_7 0.48 0.45 0.53 9 1094 9 3 5 1 11
3KIY_A - 0.67 0.68 0.66 531 1485073 336 81 195 60 255
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 10 0 6 4 10
3O58_3 0.40 0.50 0.33 11 4731 36 8 14 14 11
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 3 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 10 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of McQFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 708
Total TN 1567358
Total FP 884
Total FP CONTRA 198
Total FP INCONS 584
Total FP COMP 102
Total FN 737
Total Scores
MCC 0.482
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.625 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.490
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.75 0.83 0.68 19 1996 15 7 2 6 4
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 1 0 0 1 1
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.21 0.21 0.24 6 1447 19 2 17 0 22
3IYQ_A 0.22 0.31 0.15 16 22335 100 45 44 11 35
3IZ4_A 0.46 0.46 0.47 44 25442 56 14 36 6 51
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3KIY_A - 0.38 0.38 0.38 302 1485090 544 83 405 56 484
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.42 0.42 0.44 8 717 10 2 8 0 11
3NPB_A 0.90 0.81 1.00 30 2248 5 0 0 5 7
3O58_3 0.30 0.36 0.25 8 4732 27 15 9 3 14
3PDR_A 0.83 0.80 0.87 40 4794 9 2 4 3 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
3U4M_B - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1256 2 0 0 2 2
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.