CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MaxExpect & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MaxExpect RDfolder
MCC 0.692 > 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.153 > 0.458 ± 0.200
Sensitivity 0.667 > 0.442
Positive Predictive Value 0.731 > 0.588
Total TP 226 > 150
Total TN 14985 < 15039
Total FP 89 < 107
Total FP CONTRA 22 > 20
Total FP INCONS 61 < 85
Total FP COMP 6 > 2
Total FN 113 < 189
P-value 1.67657656842e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MaxExpect and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MaxExpect and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MaxExpect and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of MaxExpect - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MaxExpect

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 226
Total TN 14985
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 61
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.692
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.654 ± 0.153
Sensitivity 0.667
Positive Predictive Value 0.731
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for MaxExpect [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.80 0.79 0.81 22 1445 6 1 4 1 6
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3JYV_7 0.48 0.45 0.53 9 1094 9 3 5 1 11
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 3 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 150
Total TN 15039
Total FP 107
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 2
Total FN 189
Total Scores
MCC 0.501
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.458 ± 0.200
Sensitivity 0.442
Positive Predictive Value 0.588
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 2 7 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1462 10 1 9 0 28
3J0L_a - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 407 4 3 1 0 11
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.35 0.24 0.54 7 1520 6 1 5 0 22
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.