CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold CRWrnafold
MCC 0.657 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.277 > 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.667 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.658 > 0.503
Total TP 106 > 82
Total TN 10508 > 10506
Total FP 65 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 20 < 27
Total FP INCONS 35 < 54
Total FP COMP 10 < 22
Total FN 53 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 10508
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.657
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.277
Sensitivity 0.667
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
3U4M_B - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1256 2 0 0 2 2
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 10506
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.