CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.687 > 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.689 ± 0.247 > 0.574 ± 0.299
Sensitivity 0.689 > 0.552
Positive Predictive Value 0.696 < 0.743
Total TP 126 > 101
Total TN 11354 < 11399
Total FP 65 > 50
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 10
Total FP INCONS 35 > 25
Total FP COMP 10 < 15
Total FN 57 < 82
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 11354
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 57
Total Scores
MCC 0.687
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.689 ± 0.247
Sensitivity 0.689
Positive Predictive Value 0.696
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
3U4M_B - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1256 2 0 0 2 2
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 11399
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.299
Sensitivity 0.552
Positive Predictive Value 0.743
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.