CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.621 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.324 > 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.631 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.621 > 0.475
Total TP 82 > 57
Total TN 9004 < 9016
Total FP 60 < 73
Total FP CONTRA 19 < 23
Total FP INCONS 31 < 40
Total FP COMP 10 = 10
Total FN 48 < 73
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 9004
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 48
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.637 ± 0.324
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.621
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1256 2 0 0 2 2
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 9016
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.