CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.685 > 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.336 > 0.668 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.705 > 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.674 < 0.714
Total TP 93 > 80
Total TN 9182 < 9208
Total FP 52 > 42
Total FP CONTRA 16 > 11
Total FP INCONS 29 > 21
Total FP COMP 7 < 10
Total FN 39 < 52
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of McQFold and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for McQFold and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for McQFold and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 93
Total TN 9182
Total FP 52
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.685
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.336
Sensitivity 0.705
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 1 4 0 5
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 33 11 16 6 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9208
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.