CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.739 > 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.183 < 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.630 < 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.872 > 0.757
Total TP 116 < 131
Total TN 14275 > 14235
Total FP 24 < 55
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 16
Total FP INCONS 8 < 26
Total FP COMP 7 < 13
Total FN 68 > 53
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 116
Total TN 14275
Total FP 24
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 68
Total Scores
MCC 0.739
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.183
Sensitivity 0.630
Positive Predictive Value 0.872
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.37 0.32 0.44 7 4748 13 4 5 4 15
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 3 1 2 0 12
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 14235
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.