CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(20) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(20) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.654 > 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.263 < 0.668 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.576 < 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.752 > 0.714
Total TP 76 < 80
Total TN 9219 > 9208
Total FP 32 < 42
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 11
Total FP INCONS 16 < 21
Total FP COMP 7 < 10
Total FN 56 > 52
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(20) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(20) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 76
Total TN 9219
Total FP 32
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 56
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.635 ± 0.263
Sensitivity 0.576
Positive Predictive Value 0.752
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.81 0.67 1.00 16 850 0 0 0 0 8
3SD1_A 0.82 0.83 0.83 24 1504 5 4 1 0 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.20 5 4491 24 5 15 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 22 1415 3 0 0 3 7
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.57 0.33 1.00 5 491 0 0 0 0 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9208
Total FP 42
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 21
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.653
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.244
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.