Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(20) |
|
NanoFolder |
|---|
| MCC |
0.609 |
>
|
0.285 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.577
±
0.780
|
>
|
0.346
±
0.831
|
| Sensitivity |
0.578 |
>
|
0.359 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.649 |
>
|
0.240 |
| Total TP |
37 |
>
|
23 |
| Total TN |
6392 |
>
|
6353 |
| Total FP |
32 |
<
|
90 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
<
|
24 |
| Total FP INCONS |
18 |
<
|
49 |
| Total FP COMP |
12 |
<
|
17 |
| Total FN |
27 |
<
|
41 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and NanoFolder).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
and NanoFolder).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
37 |
| Total TN |
6392 |
| Total FP |
32 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
18 |
| Total FP COMP |
12 |
| Total FN |
27 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.609 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.577
±
0.780
|
| Sensitivity |
0.578 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.649 |
| Nr of predictions |
3 |
Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
23 |
| Total TN |
6353 |
| Total FP |
90 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
24 |
| Total FP INCONS |
49 |
| Total FP COMP |
17 |
| Total FN |
41 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.285 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.346
±
0.831
|
| Sensitivity |
0.359 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.240 |
| Nr of predictions |
3 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
