CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(20) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.619 > 0.529
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.416 > 0.591 ± 0.421
Sensitivity 0.570 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.682 > 0.563
Total TP 45 > 40
Total TN 6855 > 6850
Total FP 33 < 44
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 12
Total FP INCONS 19 = 19
Total FP COMP 12 < 13
Total FN 34 < 39
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 45
Total TN 6855
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 34
Total Scores
MCC 0.619
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.603 ± 0.416
Sensitivity 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.682
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.25 0.25 0.25 5 4496 25 2 13 10 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.68 0.53 0.89 8 463 1 0 1 0 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 3 0 3 0 7

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 40
Total TN 6850
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.529
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.591 ± 0.421
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.