Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
PETfold_pre2.0(seed) |
|
RNASLOpt |
|---|
| MCC |
0.695 |
>
|
0.461 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.656
±
0.215
|
>
|
0.536
±
0.307
|
| Sensitivity |
0.619 |
>
|
0.443 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.789 |
>
|
0.494 |
| Total TP |
60 |
>
|
43 |
| Total TN |
7373 |
>
|
7362 |
| Total FP |
31 |
<
|
53 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
<
|
17 |
| Total FP INCONS |
13 |
<
|
27 |
| Total FP COMP |
15 |
>
|
9 |
| Total FN |
37 |
<
|
54 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance plots
-
Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNASLOpt).
-
Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data
(individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
and RNASLOpt).
Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
60 |
| Total TN |
7373 |
| Total FP |
31 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
13 |
| Total FP COMP |
15 |
| Total FN |
37 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.695 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.656
±
0.215
|
| Sensitivity |
0.619 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.789 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt
| Total Base Pair Counts |
|---|
| Total TP |
43 |
| Total TN |
7362 |
| Total FP |
53 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
17 |
| Total FP INCONS |
27 |
| Total FP COMP |
9 |
| Total FN |
54 |
| Total Scores |
|---|
| MCC |
0.461 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.536
±
0.307
|
| Sensitivity |
0.443 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.494 |
| Nr of predictions |
5 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
| 
