CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PETfold_pre2.0(seed) TurboFold(20)
MCC 0.751 > 0.554
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.717 ± 0.195 > 0.598 ± 0.401
Sensitivity 0.684 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.831 > 0.615
Total TP 54 > 40
Total TN 6856 = 6856
Total FP 26 < 35
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 9
Total FP INCONS 8 < 16
Total FP COMP 15 > 10
Total FN 25 < 39
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) and TurboFold(20)).

^top





Performance of PETfold_pre2.0(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PETfold_pre2.0(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 54
Total TN 6856
Total FP 26
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 25
Total Scores
MCC 0.751
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.717 ± 0.195
Sensitivity 0.684
Positive Predictive Value 0.831
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for PETfold_pre2.0(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.79 0.75 0.83 15 4498 12 1 2 9 5
4AOB_A 0.85 0.79 0.92 23 1412 4 0 2 2 6
4ENB_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 461 5 1 2 2 7
4ENC_A 0.61 0.53 0.73 8 485 5 1 2 2 7

^top



Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 40
Total TN 6856
Total FP 35
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.554
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.598 ± 0.401
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.615
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.21 5 4492 28 6 13 9 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.