CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PPfold(20) & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PPfold(20) RNAshapes
MCC 0.715 > 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.240 > 0.616 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.644 > 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.802 > 0.620
Total TP 85 > 80
Total TN 9214 > 9191
Total FP 27 < 67
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 19
Total FP INCONS 18 < 30
Total FP COMP 6 < 18
Total FN 47 < 52
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PPfold(20) and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PPfold(20) and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of PPfold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PPfold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 85
Total TN 9214
Total FP 27
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 18
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 47
Total Scores
MCC 0.715
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.682 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.644
Positive Predictive Value 0.802
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for PPfold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.86 0.79 0.95 19 846 1 0 1 0 5
3SD1_A 0.81 0.76 0.88 22 1508 3 2 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.27 0.25 0.29 5 4499 16 1 11 4 15
4AOB_A 0.87 0.83 0.92 24 1411 4 0 2 2 5
4ENB_A 0.63 0.47 0.88 7 464 1 0 1 0 8
4ENC_A 0.64 0.53 0.80 8 486 2 0 2 0 7

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9191
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 52
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.616 ± 0.298
Sensitivity 0.606
Positive Predictive Value 0.620
Nr of predictions 6

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.