CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots Fold
MCC 0.654 > 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.156 > 0.538 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.636 > 0.610
Total TP 250 > 227
Total TN 27602 < 27623
Total FP 184 < 194
Total FP CONTRA 50 > 43
Total FP INCONS 93 < 102
Total FP COMP 41 < 49
Total FN 117 < 140
P-value 2.86595104665e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and Fold).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 250
Total TN 27602
Total FP 184
Total FP CONTRA 50
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.654
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.661 ± 0.156
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.636
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.79 0.83 0.76 19 1999 13 5 1 7 4
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.68 0.62 13 714 8 0 8 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.81 0.88 30 2244 9 0 4 5 7
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3PDR_A 0.64 0.64 0.65 32 4791 19 4 13 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 227
Total TN 27623
Total FP 194
Total FP CONTRA 43
Total FP INCONS 102
Total FP COMP 49
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.538 ± 0.169
Sensitivity 0.619
Positive Predictive Value 0.610
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3J0L_a - 0.15 0.18 0.17 2 399 11 4 6 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 4 7 0 11
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.