CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots RNASLOpt
MCC 0.517 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.319 > 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.546 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.504 > 0.475
Total TP 71 > 57
Total TN 8995 < 9016
Total FP 90 > 73
Total FP CONTRA 22 < 23
Total FP INCONS 48 > 40
Total FP COMP 20 > 10
Total FN 59 < 73
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 71
Total TN 8995
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 48
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.517
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.571 ± 0.319
Sensitivity 0.546
Positive Predictive Value 0.504
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 9016
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.