CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & RNAshapes [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots RNAshapes
MCC 0.676 > 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.115 > 0.641 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.693 > 0.663
Positive Predictive Value 0.668 < 0.692
Total TP 407 > 389
Total TN 37377 < 37424
Total FP 248 > 226
Total FP CONTRA 65 > 44
Total FP INCONS 137 > 129
Total FP COMP 46 < 53
Total FN 180 < 198
P-value 0.0709819156009

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and RNAshapes. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAshapes).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAshapes).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and RNAshapes. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAshapes).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 407
Total TN 37377
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 180
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.17 0.25 0.17 2 224 10 3 7 0 6
2KRL_A - 0.79 0.83 0.76 19 1999 13 5 1 7 4
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2RP0_A - 0.87 1.00 0.78 7 107 2 2 0 0 0
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.50 0.55 0.48 12 1083 13 3 10 0 10
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.66 0.57 0.80 4 153 3 0 1 2 3
3GX2_A 0.55 0.57 0.55 16 1420 14 4 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 0 1 0 3
3IWN_A 0.22 0.21 0.25 6 1448 18 2 16 0 22
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.94 0.88 1.00 22 932 0 0 0 0 3
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.68 0.62 13 714 8 0 8 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.81 0.88 30 2244 9 0 4 5 7
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3PDR_A 0.64 0.64 0.65 32 4791 19 4 13 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNAshapes - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 389
Total TN 37424
Total FP 226
Total FP CONTRA 44
Total FP INCONS 129
Total FP COMP 53
Total FN 198
Total Scores
MCC 0.672
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.641 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.663
Positive Predictive Value 0.692
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.77 0.77 0.77 17 962 5 1 4 0 5
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.84 0.80 0.89 24 1473 3 0 3 0 6
3ADB_C - 0.71 0.70 0.74 23 1788 8 0 8 0 10
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.91 0.89 0.93 25 1422 3 1 1 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1447 3 1 2 0 6
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 20 1 18 1 20
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NKB_B - 0.75 0.74 0.78 14 717 6 0 4 2 5
3NPB_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 28 2248 5 1 1 3 9
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3PDR_A 0.80 0.80 0.80 40 4790 12 3 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.