CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & RNAsubopt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots RNAsubopt
MCC 0.676 > 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.115 > 0.595 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.693 > 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.668 > 0.644
Total TP 407 > 374
Total TN 37377 < 37405
Total FP 248 < 254
Total FP CONTRA 65 > 59
Total FP INCONS 137 < 148
Total FP COMP 46 < 47
Total FN 180 < 213
P-value 5.23657817852e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and RNAsubopt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAsubopt).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAsubopt).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and RNAsubopt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and RNAsubopt).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 407
Total TN 37377
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 180
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.17 0.25 0.17 2 224 10 3 7 0 6
2KRL_A - 0.79 0.83 0.76 19 1999 13 5 1 7 4
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2RP0_A - 0.87 1.00 0.78 7 107 2 2 0 0 0
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.50 0.55 0.48 12 1083 13 3 10 0 10
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.66 0.57 0.80 4 153 3 0 1 2 3
3GX2_A 0.55 0.57 0.55 16 1420 14 4 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 0 1 0 3
3IWN_A 0.22 0.21 0.25 6 1448 18 2 16 0 22
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.94 0.88 1.00 22 932 0 0 0 0 3
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.68 0.62 13 714 8 0 8 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.81 0.88 30 2244 9 0 4 5 7
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3PDR_A 0.64 0.64 0.65 32 4791 19 4 13 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of RNAsubopt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAsubopt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 374
Total TN 37405
Total FP 254
Total FP CONTRA 59
Total FP INCONS 148
Total FP COMP 47
Total FN 213
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.595 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.644
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAsubopt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2KRL_A - 0.62 0.61 0.64 14 2002 15 5 3 7 9
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.52 0.55 0.52 12 961 11 3 8 0 10
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.53 0.54 0.54 15 1421 14 4 9 1 13
3IVN_B 0.88 0.78 1.00 18 885 0 0 0 0 5
3IWN_A 0.69 0.68 0.70 19 1445 9 1 7 1 9
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1090 21 4 17 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.66 0.68 0.65 13 715 7 0 7 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.78 0.91 29 2246 8 0 3 5 8
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.73 0.72 0.75 21 1505 7 4 3 0 8
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4481 43 13 17 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.62 0.64 18 1409 11 4 6 1 11
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 7 0 7 0 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.