CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Pknots & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Pknots TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.666 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.717 ± 0.296 > 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.680 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.662 > 0.602
Total TP 102 > 80
Total TN 9694 < 9715
Total FP 71 > 66
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 17
Total FP INCONS 36 = 36
Total FP COMP 19 > 13
Total FN 48 < 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Pknots and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Pknots and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Pknots and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of Pknots - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 102
Total TN 9694
Total FP 71
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 48
Total Scores
MCC 0.666
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.717 ± 0.296
Sensitivity 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.662
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9715
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.602
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.