CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for PknotsRG & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric PknotsRG NanoFolder
MCC 0.531 > 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.353 > 0.470 ± 0.376
Sensitivity 0.577 > 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.500 > 0.365
Total TP 60 > 54
Total TN 8133 > 8105
Total FP 73 < 113
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 31
Total FP INCONS 39 < 63
Total FP COMP 13 < 19
Total FN 44 < 50
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of PknotsRG and NanoFolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for PknotsRG and NanoFolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for PknotsRG and NanoFolder).

^top





Performance of PknotsRG - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 60
Total TN 8133
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 39
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 44
Total Scores
MCC 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.580 ± 0.353
Sensitivity 0.577
Positive Predictive Value 0.500
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.66 0.61 0.73 11 513 4 2 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top



Performance of NanoFolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 54
Total TN 8105
Total FP 113
Total FP CONTRA 31
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 50
Total Scores
MCC 0.427
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.470 ± 0.376
Sensitivity 0.519
Positive Predictive Value 0.365
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for NanoFolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.54 0.61 0.50 11 506 11 1 10 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.77 0.91 0.67 20 1246 12 6 4 2 2
4A1C_2 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 4469 61 18 29 14 20
4AOB_A 0.39 0.41 0.39 12 1406 20 4 15 1 17
4ENC_A 0.66 0.73 0.61 11 478 9 2 5 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.