CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot MCFold
MCC 0.585 > 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.193 > 0.516 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.633 > 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.552 > 0.514
Total TP 155 > 144
Total TN 20156 < 20157
Total FP 160 < 174
Total FP CONTRA 46 > 36
Total FP INCONS 80 < 100
Total FP COMP 34 < 38
Total FN 90 < 101
P-value 8.97952969696e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ProbKnot and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ProbKnot and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ProbKnot and MCFold).

^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 155
Total TN 20156
Total FP 160
Total FP CONTRA 46
Total FP INCONS 80
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 90
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.558 ± 0.193
Sensitivity 0.633
Positive Predictive Value 0.552
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 144
Total TN 20157
Total FP 174
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 38
Total FN 101
Total Scores
MCC 0.544
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.516 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.588
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3NKB_B - 0.68 0.74 0.64 14 713 8 2 6 0 5
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.