CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.767 > 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.127 > 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.674 < 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.879 > 0.757
Total TP 124 < 131
Total TN 14267 > 14235
Total FP 29 < 55
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 16
Total FP INCONS 11 < 26
Total FP COMP 12 < 13
Total FN 60 > 53
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 124
Total TN 14267
Total FP 29
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 11
Total FP COMP 12
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.767
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.757 ± 0.127
Sensitivity 0.674
Positive Predictive Value 0.879
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 5 1 2 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 14235
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.