CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNASampler(20) Fold
MCC 0.659 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.147 > 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.563 < 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.778 > 0.611
Total TP 189 < 214
Total TN 46495 > 46388
Total FP 90 < 182
Total FP CONTRA 24 < 45
Total FP INCONS 30 < 91
Total FP COMP 36 < 46
Total FN 147 > 122
P-value 1.30295446166e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNASampler(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNASampler(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNASampler(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 189
Total TN 46495
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 24
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 36
Total FN 147
Total Scores
MCC 0.659
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.147
Sensitivity 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.778
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.41 0.65 39 25476 26 15 6 5 56
3NPB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 2257 5 0 0 5 16
3O58_3 0.51 0.50 0.52 11 4743 19 5 5 9 11
3PDR_A 0.84 0.76 0.93 38 4799 5 1 2 2 12
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.81 0.69 0.95 20 1512 1 0 1 0 9
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 30 3 13 14 15
4AOB_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1417 4 0 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 465 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 46388
Total FP 182
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.