CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) Cylofold
MCC 0.774 > 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.712 ± 0.177 < 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.679 < 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.887 > 0.757
Total TP 125 < 131
Total TN 14267 > 14235
Total FP 20 < 55
Total FP CONTRA 8 < 16
Total FP INCONS 8 < 26
Total FP COMP 4 < 13
Total FN 59 > 53
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 125
Total TN 14267
Total FP 20
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 8
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.774
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.712 ± 0.177
Sensitivity 0.679
Positive Predictive Value 0.887
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.42 0.36 0.50 8 4748 9 3 5 1 14
3PDR_A 0.92 0.88 0.96 44 4794 3 1 1 1 6
3RKF_A 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 848 1 0 1 0 7
3SD1_A 0.84 0.86 0.83 25 1503 5 4 1 0 4
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 131
Total TN 14235
Total FP 55
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 26
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 53
Total Scores
MCC 0.731
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.754 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.