CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(20) Fold
MCC 0.690 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.159 > 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.586 < 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.817 > 0.611
Total TP 197 < 214
Total TN 46497 > 46388
Total FP 62 < 182
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 45
Total FP INCONS 27 < 91
Total FP COMP 18 < 46
Total FN 139 > 122
P-value 1.1568170475e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 197
Total TN 46497
Total FP 62
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 139
Total Scores
MCC 0.690
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.660 ± 0.159
Sensitivity 0.586
Positive Predictive Value 0.817
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.65 0.48 0.87 46 25483 15 4 3 8 49
3NPB_A 0.75 0.57 1.00 21 2257 4 0 0 4 16
3O58_3 0.42 0.36 0.50 8 4748 9 3 5 1 14
3PDR_A 0.92 0.88 0.96 44 4794 3 1 1 1 6
3RKF_A 0.81 0.71 0.94 17 848 1 0 1 0 7
3SD1_A 0.84 0.86 0.83 25 1503 5 4 1 0 4
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 23 5 16 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.51 0.27 1.00 4 468 0 0 0 0 11
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 46388
Total FP 182
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.