CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAalifold(seed) & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAalifold(seed) Pknots
MCC 0.706 > 0.695
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.665 ± 0.130 < 0.728 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.564 < 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.892 > 0.686
Total TP 206 < 260
Total TN 26305 > 26157
Total FP 35 < 153
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 42
Total FP INCONS 19 < 77
Total FP COMP 10 < 34
Total FN 159 > 105
P-value 0.000375209661743

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAalifold(seed) and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAalifold(seed) and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) and Pknots).

^top





Performance of RNAalifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAalifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 206
Total TN 26305
Total FP 35
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 19
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 159
Total Scores
MCC 0.706
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.665 ± 0.130
Sensitivity 0.564
Positive Predictive Value 0.892
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAalifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 516 12 0 12 0 18
3A3A_A 0.79 0.63 1.00 19 1481 0 0 0 0 11
3GX2_A 0.88 0.79 1.00 22 1427 1 0 0 1 6
3IVN_B 0.71 0.65 0.79 15 884 4 2 2 0 8
3LA5_A 0.73 0.64 0.84 16 935 3 1 2 0 9
3NPB_A 0.77 0.59 1.00 22 2256 3 0 0 3 15
3O58_3 0.60 0.36 1.00 8 4756 1 0 0 1 14
3PDR_A 0.81 0.66 1.00 33 4807 1 0 0 1 17
3RKF_A 0.74 0.67 0.84 16 847 3 1 2 0 8
3SD1_A 0.70 0.59 0.85 17 1513 3 2 1 0 12
4A1C_2 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 4511 2 0 0 2 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 2 0 0 2 8
4ENB_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 466 0 0 0 0 9
4ENC_A 0.63 0.40 1.00 6 490 0 0 0 0 9

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 260
Total TN 26157
Total FP 153
Total FP CONTRA 42
Total FP INCONS 77
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 105
Total Scores
MCC 0.695
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.728 ± 0.157
Sensitivity 0.712
Positive Predictive Value 0.686
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.55 0.57 0.55 16 1420 14 4 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 0 1 0 3
3LA5_A 0.94 0.88 1.00 22 932 0 0 0 0 3
3NPB_A 0.84 0.81 0.88 30 2244 9 0 4 5 7
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3PDR_A 0.64 0.64 0.65 32 4791 19 4 13 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.