CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold ProbKnot
MCC 0.583 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.142 > 0.574 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.627 > 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.548 > 0.525
Total TP 301 > 294
Total TN 73603 > 73592
Total FP 311 < 341
Total FP CONTRA 106 < 114
Total FP INCONS 142 < 152
Total FP COMP 63 < 75
Total FN 179 < 186
P-value 6.84390417318e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 301
Total TN 73603
Total FP 311
Total FP CONTRA 106
Total FP INCONS 142
Total FP COMP 63
Total FN 179
Total Scores
MCC 0.583
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.601 ± 0.142
Sensitivity 0.627
Positive Predictive Value 0.548
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.17 17 22340 95 45 38 12 34
3IZ4_A 0.56 0.60 0.52 57 25426 57 26 27 4 38
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.91 0.86 0.97 32 2245 5 1 0 4 5
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3PDR_A 0.90 0.90 0.90 45 4790 7 2 3 2 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 294
Total TN 73592
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 114
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 186
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.82 0.87 0.77 20 1998 15 6 0 9 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.