CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.470 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.228 < 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.485 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.470 < 0.475
Total TP 63 > 57
Total TN 9002 < 9016
Total FP 90 > 73
Total FP CONTRA 21 < 23
Total FP INCONS 50 > 40
Total FP COMP 19 > 10
Total FN 67 < 73
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 63
Total TN 9002
Total FP 90
Total FP CONTRA 21
Total FP INCONS 50
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 67
Total Scores
MCC 0.470
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.475 ± 0.228
Sensitivity 0.485
Positive Predictive Value 0.470
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 9016
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.