CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold RNAwolf
MCC 0.569 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.207 > 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.574 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.577 > 0.452
Total TP 105 > 80
Total TN 11353 < 11358
Total FP 96 < 114
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 22
Total FP INCONS 52 < 75
Total FP COMP 19 > 17
Total FN 78 < 103
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 105
Total TN 11353
Total FP 96
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 52
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.569
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.556 ± 0.207
Sensitivity 0.574
Positive Predictive Value 0.577
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 11358
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.