CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAfold & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAfold TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.607 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.242 > 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.607 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.619 > 0.602
Total TP 91 > 80
Total TN 9701 < 9715
Total FP 74 > 66
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 17
Total FP INCONS 37 > 36
Total FP COMP 18 > 13
Total FN 59 < 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAfold and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAfold and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAfold and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of RNAfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 91
Total TN 9701
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 59
Total Scores
MCC 0.607
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.618 ± 0.242
Sensitivity 0.607
Positive Predictive Value 0.619
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9715
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.602
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.