CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RNAshapes & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RNAshapes MCFold
MCC 0.651 > 0.527
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.137 > 0.498 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.647 > 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.664 > 0.508
Total TP 301 > 262
Total TN 29975 > 29912
Total FP 193 < 299
Total FP CONTRA 38 < 68
Total FP INCONS 114 < 186
Total FP COMP 41 < 45
Total FN 164 < 203
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RNAshapes and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RNAshapes and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RNAshapes and MCFold).

^top





Performance of RNAshapes - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAshapes

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 301
Total TN 29975
Total FP 193
Total FP CONTRA 38
Total FP INCONS 114
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.651
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.619 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.647
Positive Predictive Value 0.664
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAshapes [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 229 7 1 6 0 8
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 0 5 0 7
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.77 0.77 0.77 17 962 5 1 4 0 5
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.84 0.80 0.89 24 1473 3 0 3 0 6
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.91 0.89 0.93 25 1422 3 1 1 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.83 0.79 0.88 22 1447 3 1 2 0 6
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 20 1 18 1 20
3LA5_A 0.89 0.80 1.00 20 934 0 0 0 0 5
3NKB_B - 0.75 0.74 0.78 14 717 6 0 4 2 5
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3PDR_A 0.80 0.80 0.80 40 4790 12 3 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.16 5 4484 41 11 16 14 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 262
Total TN 29912
Total FP 299
Total FP CONTRA 68
Total FP INCONS 186
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 203
Total Scores
MCC 0.527
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.498 ± 0.118
Sensitivity 0.563
Positive Predictive Value 0.508
Nr of predictions 22

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.54 0.63 0.50 5 226 5 2 3 0 3
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2RP0_A - 0.70 0.71 0.71 5 109 2 1 1 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.69 0.73 0.67 16 960 11 1 7 3 6
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 1471 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 150 8 4 4 0 7
3GX2_A 0.58 0.61 0.57 17 1419 15 1 12 2 11
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3IWN_A 0.19 0.21 0.20 6 1442 24 5 19 0 22
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3JYV_7 0.25 0.30 0.24 6 1086 20 8 11 1 14
3LA5_A 0.44 0.44 0.48 11 931 12 2 10 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.68 0.74 0.64 14 713 8 2 6 0 5
3O58_3 0.28 0.36 0.22 8 4727 39 14 15 10 14
3PDR_A 0.78 0.80 0.77 40 4788 14 5 7 2 10
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16
3U4M_B - 0.74 0.77 0.71 17 1252 10 1 6 3 5
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 45 12 19 14 15
4ENB_A 0.78 0.73 0.85 11 459 4 0 2 2 4
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 11 0 8 3 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.